SambWrite Blog Contributor: LUCY

Friday, July 25, 2014

 Ready for Scarlett Johansson to perform “Through the Wormhole”-esq feats with Morgan Freeman conveniently there to explain it all? 

By Tinsel & Tine Blog Contributor: Sam Watson

“Lucy” was written and directed by Luc Besson, and judging from the trailer, I wasn't quite sure what to make of this movie -
Would it be straight up science fiction?
Or be similar to recent comic book flicks in which we see characters develop superhuman abilities?  -
I wasn't sure, and after seeing the film, I don’t think it nails down what it is, either.

The film revolves around Lucy (Scarlett Johansson) – a 25-year-old student, who may or may not be studying abroad, but definitely partying it up, in Taiwain. Her friend Richard (Pilou Asbæk) forces her to deliver a suitcase to some pretty bad people led by Mr. Jang (Choi Min-shik), who we find out plans to distribute the next “it” drug across Europe. Problem is, Jang needs mules to deliver said drugs to targeted cities. So, they implant bags of the drug- blue rocks that may elicit the copyright ire of Walter White- into the bellies of Lucy and three other poor saps. Jang’s English-speaking associate then threatens their lives and families if they don’t complete their mission. Lucy is eventually roughed up by one of her guards, which causes her belly bag to rupture, spilling the drug directly into her blood stream in huge quantities. This has a surprising effect on the woman as it drastically enables her to use more brainpower than anyone has ever before.

Professor Norman (Morgan Freeman) is introduced, while sharing his research on the brain with the most polite class ever. As with “Through the Wormhole”, Freeman’s character is there to explain all this weird science stuff to us. “Lucy” employs one of the most well known tropes of science fiction: The notion that humans only use 10% of their brains, and what if we could unlock the other 90? This is something we’ve seen in countless other films and sci-fi mediums, but “Lucy” fails to establish the rules of its own universe. In general, movies require us to dispel our beliefs about reality and to buy into the rules of the fictional world on the screen. This is especially true of science fiction and fantasy flicks, which require us to believe that a man can fly, ships can travel faster than light and suits of armor can make mere humans into living tanks. So, it’s important to set up the rules of a movie’s universe and to stick to them. “Lucy’s” rules are basically explained
to us when Professor Smooth Voice tells his class what would theoretically happen if someone started to use more than 10% of his or her brain. He goes through it in stages. What would happen at 20%? What would happen at 40%, 50% and so on? But his predictions only go so far, so we are left wondering what Lucy will be able to accomplish as her brain reaches full power. And that’s a good thing. You don’t want to know what’s exactly going to happen. The audience should be able to experience Lucy’s transformation with surprise and fear for her well-being. But things happen to her onscreen, and are never explained. There’s a scene on an airplane, where Lucy’s body appears to be on the fritz, and we’re not quite sure why. It’s as though the audience is supposed to simply accept what we see without any sort of cohesive explanation that makes sense.

I feel that if this were a “Superman” film, we would never get the explanation of why Superman can fly, but Amr Waked), a cop, who, when witnessing Lucy’s abilities for the first time, doesn’t have any reaction that indicates surprise or confusion. He only states that it was one of the more freaky things he’s seen on the job, and that’s it! He immediately accepts that Lucy can perform these supernatural feats and doesn’t question it. He simply straps in for the ride. 
simply just that he’s a man who can fly, so deal with it. I actually have a theory that Besson wants the audience to be just like Pierre Del Rio (

One of the film’s central conflicts revolves around the fact that Lucy is losing her humanity as her brainpower nears 100%. And that is a very tragic notion- to loose the emotions, desires and functions that make us a complicated, relatable and unique species. The film wants us to feel bad for Lucy’s continued evolution into some sort of machine-like state, but we never do...

And that’s mainly because we never get to meet Lucy as an actual well-rounded and fleshed out human being before her change. It’s hard to care about someone loosing her humanity if we were never able to connect with it in the first place. Presenting Lucy as nothing more than a student/party girl leaves us with nothing to relate to on a human level. So every time she expresses concern over becoming less human, those scenes just don’t carry the weight they should.

Lucy has a penchant for telling us all the different ways she feels different and it usually comes off as very silly. Even Morgan Freeman eventually sounds more like someone who’s stoned, as if he just smoked his best weed and feels like explaining grand scientific concepts to all of his friends. Also, less than halfway through the film, I realized that “brain” is a very awkward word to say in excess. Brain. It just doesn’t sound quite natural, especially when used in lines such as “I can feel my brain”, which is something Lucy says at one point. I half expected her to then utter, “Whoa, man” as a puff of scented smoke emerges from her mouth.

 This film could have been a fun science fiction/action movie to fill our eyes with without our brains getting in
the way. But the director doesn’t allow us such an escape. From the very first line of the movie, it’s apparent that the film has a message and it doesn’t let us forget. It also manages to confuse us on what that message actually is. Should ultimate knowledge be shared among mankind or is such knowledge dangerous, because of what mankind might choose to do with it? I think that the film does state which side of this issue it supports, but the getting there is very muddled by Lucy’s confusing display of power. Professor Norman flip-flops on this issue a couple of times. And, judging from a Morgan Freeman voiceover, we are supposed to link the dangers of ultimate knowledge with the corrupt and violent bad guys who are after Lucy. But that falls flat, because these guys are really only pissed that she screwed up their drug business and are out for vengeance.

This movie wasn’t without its moments of fun and light heartedness, though- especially when the action ramps up to a sudden ridiculous degree (rocket launcher). One of Mr. Jang’s minions runs over to his master and declares Lucy a witch after he witnesses her power during a pretty comedic showdown in a hospital hallway. But these moments are short lived, because the rest of the story feels as stilted and mechanical as Lucy herself. So, now let me amend my opening sentence by saying: If you want to see Scarlett Johansson perform “Through the Wormhole”-esq feats with Morgan Freeman conveniently there to explain it all, well, you should probably ignore the good professor, because he’s totally high and she’s obviously tripping on something synthetic.

T &T's LAMB Score: 2.5 outta 5

Comments are welcome on the facebook page on the post.

While You're Here Check Out

T&T's PinMeal Tine Ratings - Bufad Pizza 13& Spring Garden
Our new way of posting dining reviews - I call them PinMeals, I tried this one a few weeks back for Bufad Pizza, and I'm going to post more this way. I think it's a faster method to get up Tinsel & Tine restaurant experiences which often sit forever in my camera and mind, never to be posted, as I give first priority to the movies and events.

Tinsel & Tine: Philly Film, Food & Events Blog

Philly Events Calendar

ADD YOUR EVENT for FREE! - which includes SOCIAL MEDIA BLASTS!  Click AGENDA VIEW to see complete list of happenings.

Featured Post


Tinsel & Tine Winners for Preview Screening Contest Guest on The LAMB Podcast Lambcast #470: CAPTAIN MARVEL w/ Rich Kirkh...

Food n Film: BURNT

Food n Film: BURNT
Bradley Cooper has more than charisma, he has an over abundance of Chi, which radiates out from him; so for me, this role as temperamental and damaged chef Adam Jones, who also inspires great love and admiration from those around him, works on the level of characterization. In fact, I think he's among a very short list of actors who would be able to pull off being so self-involved and yet likable. Doesn't hurt that he really speaks French too! READ POST

Food n Film: CHEF

Food n Film: CHEF
Much of the movie centers around the father/son relationship, and how much they learn from each other. But the real star of the film is all the food preparation, every other scene made me groan with want of everything up on that screen! Particularly the perfectly roasted and rubbed brisket, the crispy fat of the pork belly, sizzling bacon and the much ballyhooed Chocolate Lava Cake. READ POST


The key to deciphering both the city it beautifully depicts and the man who eats it best - City of Gold

By Tinsel & Tine Contributor Denine Gorniak (The Bicycle-Chef)

What Jonathan Gold, Los Angeles Times food critic/writer, has done for food writing journalism and for the restaurants that he loves, the movie, City of Gold has done for Jonathan Gold and Los Angeles and its surrounding environs – it has planted taco covered kisses on them... READ POST

Food n Film: CHOCOLAT

Food n Film: CHOCOLAT
If you’re a foodie movie lover who saw Lasse Hallström’s The Hundred Foot Journey (see T&T post), this summer you may be wondering what delicious visual journey might be awaiting you in the theater next. Well, how about a look back at his film Chocolat (2000), which stars French actress Juliette Binoche, Judi Dench and Johnny Depp. Hallström’s has a special talent for turning cooking into a dramatic movie journey...READ MORE


...young Hassan, a soulful-eyed boy with lush, thick eye lashes, places his face into the sea urchin basket, and breathes in the exotic briny scent. He sticks his fingers into the aquatic ooze, takes it to his mouth and is transfixed by the taste. The vendor, oblivious to the thrusting arms of frenzied women, notices the boy and realizes he is the only one worthy of this oceanic prize; he is the one who can “truly taste.” ... READ MORE

Food n Film: JULIE & JULIA

Food n Film: JULIE & JULIA
Personally, I like the unevenness of it, because I fell in love with the post World War II, Parisian sights, sounds, food and romance between Julia and Paul. I always felt a bit jarred back into reality when the scenes returned to Julie's meltdowns and cramped kitchen.READ POST

Food n Film: EAT PRAY LOVE

Food n Film: EAT PRAY LOVE
Six months into my 38th year of this life, I had my first panic attack. I didn't know that's what it was until months later. Symptom after symptom starting piling up on me until there were days I could no longer move my arms or neck. The doctors told me I was suffering from an auto-immune condition that they felt was most likely Lupus. And so began my much deeper journey and exploration into the world of spirit, alternative medicine, yoga, meditation and Eat, Pray, Love. READ POST


With a film like this, food plays a main character in the story and I was lucky enough to get an interview with the film's Food Stylist, Janine Kalesis.READ POST

Food n Film: WAITRESS

Food n Film: WAITRESS
In this 2007 film, Keri Russell stars as Jenna - a desolate diner waitress seeking solace in the art of pie-making. Trapped in an unhappy marriage, she’s eager to escape her husband and her small-town hell and sets about to make a run for it by entering an out of town pie baking contest. READ POST


Those of us in attendance were not only given the opportunity to see Babette's Feast, the Oscar winning, Danish film, considered one of the all-time great "food films"; we also got to taste Babette's menu! READ POST


I participated in WalkMS Philly on 4/30/16
Thank you to the readers who donated to the cause - It's not too late to support! Click badge below

15 Top Food in Film Flicks

15 Top Food in Film Flicks
Cozy Quilt of Food Movies, we'll add more patches as T &T discovers more films where food plays the biggest "roll"

Tinsel & Tine on

Tinsel & Tine on
Really love this platform, you feature your stuff and other people's stuff you follow, and it all configures like the front page of a newspaper. Click to see what I mean

Visit Our YouTube Channel

Visit Our YouTube Channel
View Q & A's with visiting Filmmakers to Philly

Philly Food and Film

Videographer Oliver Gallini 5 min short featuring organic-chemist-turned-chef, Townsend Wentz, who got his start at The Four Seasons Philadelphia.


Cross Content Blogs


Large Association of Movie Blogs

Tinsel & Tine was nominated for a VBA



group of 10,000 women bloggers dedicated to supporting one another by leaving comments

Women Online

The Blogstress Network

The Blogstress Network
Female Bloggers Unite

Contributor from 2010 - 2012

About This Blog

is about discovering what I find pleasing in screening & eating - in case you missed it, the name is a play on Tinseltown using the Tines of a Fork.

Feel free to send me info on a film or new restaurant you'd like me to highlight.

Will there ever be a cap on movie prices?

Will we one day pay $20 a pop?

Why don't we pay on a scale?

A crap movie like everything Adam Sandler has ever done should cost about $4.50.
Big action movies like"Lord of the Rings", "Iron Man," "Transformers" are worth $10.
Woody Allen movie or something like "Silver Linings Playbook" $6-$7.
A chick flick or light comedy $5.75 and most Indie Films $5.25.

You could even do it by seasons - all summer block busters from May to August - $10
Sept - November 15th $3.50 - $4
Back to $10 for Thanksgiving and Christmas etc...

Or you can do it by A Actors ($9 - $10), B Actors ($6 - $7) TV actors on the big screen ($3.50 - $4)

Surely I'm not the first person to realize this makes sense. Has it been voted on in the Motion Picture Industry and then vetoed? If so, why?

Camera Tips


  © Blogger template On The Road by 2009

Back to TOP